The necessary ones make the site work. The others measure which pages help and which ads bring the people who need DM11. Your choice, and you can revisit it from the footer.
SASTACTION®: SECURE CODE REVIEW
Your customer asks for a source code security review carried out by an independent third party, with identification they can check themselves. SastAction® is the Secure Code Review platform, and it delivers that evidence without installing anything in your environment and without exposing your code to anyone.
3
reports from the same analysis
0
agents installed in your environment
365 days
of public report verification
30 days
until the submitted code is deleted
HOW IT WORKS
Five verification domains run in parallel over the same code package, every finding goes through risk assessment before it reaches you, and artificial intelligence comes in after that, to explain and to estimate effort.
You request the analysis through a form and receive a single-use upload link that expires as soon as the transfer finishes. Nothing is installed in your environment, there is no agent and there is no mandatory integration with your development pipeline. The code is processed in isolated containers with no network access and deleted after 30 days.
The same copy of the code goes through static source code analysis, detection of forgotten secrets and credentials, third-party dependencies, infrastructure and container configuration, and mobile application security where it applies. Each domain is covered by more than one specialized engine, and results are deduplicated by file, line and weakness type before they enter the report.
The order of findings comes from probability and technical impact combined. Dependency findings also draw on EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, the statistical likelihood that a flaw gets exploited) and the KEV catalog (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, the list kept by the United States cybersecurity agency of what is already under active exploitation). The databases are synchronised before each run and their date is recorded in the report.
The model runs inside our own environment, and your code never goes to a third-party AI provider. The risk rating is produced by a deterministic rule, and the AI comes in after it, in separate fields: business reading of the finding, suggested fix and estimated effort. Every generation is logged with an input hash and an output hash, and one lock is fixed: a finding under known active exploitation cannot be dismissed as a false positive by any model.
The technical one carries each vulnerability with file, line, the code excerpt with the vulnerable line highlighted, CWE classification (Common Weakness Enumeration, the international catalog of weakness types, including the CWE Top 25) and OWASP, business reading and a fix with estimated effort. The executive one speaks the board's language: risk score, severity distribution, most frequent categories, most affected files and a prioritized recommendation. The public one travels outside your company, with no code and no vulnerability detail.
The public report carries a QR code and a hash printed on the cover. Your customer, your auditor or the bank's procurement team opens the validation page and confirms authenticity with no login, no sign-up and no cost, for 365 days. They see metadata only: date, system, lines analyzed, count by severity and the checks executed in this analysis.
BEFORE AND AFTER
Tell us the context of your project and receive the proposal with the scope of the analysis. If you would rather see first how the proof reaches your customer, we will show you a public report and the page where it gets validated.